Easy2Siksha.com
1. Price vs variable cost:
o Selling price offered = Rs. 1.50 per belt.
o Variable manufacturing cost per belt = Rs. 3.00.
o Even ignoring depreciation, producing a belt costs Rs. 3.00 in materials +
labour + variable overhead, which is higher than the offered price 1.50. So
each belt would lose 3.00 − 1.50 = Rs. 1.50 on a pure variable basis.
2. Capacity:
o Annual manufacturing capacity = 30,000 belts.
o Order size = 50,000 belts → exceeds capacity.
o Even if the factory tanks capacity to 30,000, the remaining 20,000 belts
would need to be subcontracted or bought from outside; both options still
cost at least Rs. 2.00 each to buy (supplier price), which is still >1.50 selling
price.
Numeric check if we tried to produce 30,000 ourselves and buy 20,000:
Produce 30,000: variable cost 3.00 × 30,000 = 90,000; plus depreciation maybe rises
because machine used more, but depreciation fixed at 9,000 per year (if we bought
machine for this purpose).
Buy 20,000: 20,000 × 2.00 = 40,000.
Total cost = 90,000 + 40,000 = 130,000.
Revenue from selling 50,000 at 1.50 = 50,000 × 1.50 = 75,000.
Loss = 130,000 − 75,000 = 55,000 (a big loss). So definitely not acceptable.
Even if LNM doesnt manufacture and instead buys all 50,000 belts at Rs. 2.00 and sells at
1.50, every belt loses 0.50 total loss 50,000 × 0.50 = 25,000. Still bad.
Conclusion for (b): The order at Rs. 1.50 should be rejected. The offered price is below both
variable cost of manufacture (3.00) and the purchase price (2.00). Accepting would cause a
cash loss.
Simple diagram to visualize the decision
+---------------------------+
| LNM needs / offered order|
+---------------------------+
/ \
/ \
(a) Own need 20,000 (b) External order 50,000
Buy = 20,000×2 = 40,000 Revenue = 50,000×1.5 = 75,000
| |
Make? compute costs Can we make cheaply?
Variable = 3.00/unit Var cost = 3.00/unit > 1.50
Depn = 9,000/yr => 0.45/unit
Total = 3.45/unit => 69,000/yr
| |
Decision: Buy (40,000) Decision: Reject order
(Cheaper than 69,000) (Would create losses)